This quote with my own brand of mishmash around it keeps popping up in my brain: Writing is such sweet sorrow, why don't I wait to write, until tomorrow? But alas, I've spent over six years plugging away on my book and it does not deserve my lack of attention, even excitement. It tackles timely and universal issues and relates an arresting story. Some have called it a page-turner.
I hope so. Last week my published friend tells me: It's all about the title, Kathy. I open websites, peer through blurred eyes at titles. Duplicities is too bland. Even if I followed it up with "The Other Side of BB Mountain", how many people would stop in their tracks?
Here's my new very tentative title: Sex, Lies and Roman Collars: One Woman's Journey to Hell and Back.
Tell me what you think. The second part, is it too common? I welcome suggestions.
the other side of 'brokeback mountain'
Monday, August 13, 2012
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Adios to our beloved Saguaro
When we first discovered our lovely home in the Tucson desert, we especially loved the idea of having a giant saguaro--perhaps eighteen or twenty feet high, complete with three sturdy muscled arms, as the focal point of our garden. Because the previous owners had installed a spotlight, we could enjoy its awesome majesty even in the dark of night. That was 2003.
Soon we noticed that our saguaro had become a cozy bed & breakfast inn for several birds, who used its cavities for spring birthing rites. We often talked of raising the rents, but we never did. Each year the birds returned, without complaint, enjoying their high rise apartments complete with nurseries. They even took pleasure in the little red blossoms which bloomed annually atop our giant, garlands on its rounded head.
In the last two years the unthinkable happened: our beloved saguaro began to lean. At first slightly, then
more so, teetering to the right, hovering dangerously over a tree and a hot tub. Alarmed, we called an expert. "It's going," he said. "But maybe if we cut the farthest leaning limb we can prop it up."
My husband wanted to take it out immediately. I winced. Oh, no, please. Let's try the prop.
The ugly prop bore a strong resemblance to a mop. We tried to ignore its pedestrian look, hugging our majestic cactus. We were just happy that our saguaro was still standing.
But not for long. In the last few months the heavy winds and rains of the monsoons have sealed its fate. Today I witnessed three strong men, scaling very long ladders, preparing to take out our dear saguaro. When they first arrived, their blades in hand, I ventured out. "Oh, dear," I said, "I am so sad.
Does it really have to go?"
The wide smiling man dressed in denim jeans and blue shirt, turned to me. "This is happening all over town. We've got another one later today if we have time."
It was no use. I padded back into the house, put in my ear plugs, and spent the next three hours writing.
I did not want to hear the saws or see our old guardian's limbs torn down and transported across the lawn and into a truck bed. I could not bear it.
Just now I slipped outside. The recently vacated spot seems glaring in its emptiness. But we have hope. We're ordering a new cactus, very strong, very sure of itself, the man says, in the desert. It's called a
senita.
Senita, you can't arrive too soon.
Soon we noticed that our saguaro had become a cozy bed & breakfast inn for several birds, who used its cavities for spring birthing rites. We often talked of raising the rents, but we never did. Each year the birds returned, without complaint, enjoying their high rise apartments complete with nurseries. They even took pleasure in the little red blossoms which bloomed annually atop our giant, garlands on its rounded head.
In the last two years the unthinkable happened: our beloved saguaro began to lean. At first slightly, then
more so, teetering to the right, hovering dangerously over a tree and a hot tub. Alarmed, we called an expert. "It's going," he said. "But maybe if we cut the farthest leaning limb we can prop it up."
My husband wanted to take it out immediately. I winced. Oh, no, please. Let's try the prop.
The ugly prop bore a strong resemblance to a mop. We tried to ignore its pedestrian look, hugging our majestic cactus. We were just happy that our saguaro was still standing.
But not for long. In the last few months the heavy winds and rains of the monsoons have sealed its fate. Today I witnessed three strong men, scaling very long ladders, preparing to take out our dear saguaro. When they first arrived, their blades in hand, I ventured out. "Oh, dear," I said, "I am so sad.
Does it really have to go?"
The wide smiling man dressed in denim jeans and blue shirt, turned to me. "This is happening all over town. We've got another one later today if we have time."
It was no use. I padded back into the house, put in my ear plugs, and spent the next three hours writing.
I did not want to hear the saws or see our old guardian's limbs torn down and transported across the lawn and into a truck bed. I could not bear it.
Just now I slipped outside. The recently vacated spot seems glaring in its emptiness. But we have hope. We're ordering a new cactus, very strong, very sure of itself, the man says, in the desert. It's called a
senita.
Senita, you can't arrive too soon.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Pilgrims' Progress: Exploring the Roundabouts in the U.K.
As dusk dropped its veil on us, we pulled into yet another
village, Weatherby, where we lodged in a B&B (rather ancient but warm
enough in the chilly rain) called the White Rose.
We drove along accompanied by intermittent heaving rain. Our
Cotswold's plan began to look less viable. In Lincoln once again we visited the grand 12th
century cathedral dedicated to St. Hugh (never heard of Hugh but we were told
that the choir, named for him, was likely a place where he'd prayed. Lots of
carvings of seated angels playing harps, pipes, drums). Here I was reminded of
Ken Follett's intriguing novel about three-hundred-year project of constructing
a cathedral called Pillars of the Earth. Happily
we got in on a wonderful tour by a guide passionate about the church.
Our third cathedral visit (guess we could be pilgrims by now, wending our way from Canterbury) was in Wells, another majestic
church. This time we made it in time for Matins, and we were directed by a
balding gowned cleric to sit right in back of the choir. Great seats!
Great music. Choir comprised of little boys so tiny we could barely see
their eyes over the pews and men older than Paul (can you imagine?). Delicious harmonies. We were fortunate to tag
along on tour that had already started, from a guide passionate and
knowledgeable about the cathedral.
And onto Portsmouth
for two days. Our luxury B & B, run by a ebullient Irish woman who told me
her whole tragic life story (inquire on email for further details), was quite
lovely and only a stone's throw away from the Portsmouth beach walkway. It didn't quite
live up to West Cliff Drive
in Santa Cruz ,
but we savored our stroll there anyway. Paul toured a Navy Museum ,
and I walked farther. Found the downtown area quite charming and a small
intimate restaurant (name eludes me) where we ended up dining both nights.
The second morning we took a four-plus mile trek across the
city to explore the early childhood home of the Dickens' family. Not too shabby
for Charles' father who'd be sent eventually to Debtor's Prison. By the way the
signage was so bad that, had I not asked a scruffy kid playing in the street,
we would have entirely missed the place. (not the only time we were challenged
by the Brits' poor signage).
On our way to Windsor
it began pouring again but by now we were accustomed to English weather and
waited with equanimity for a space of dry. Then we took to the puddled streets,
strolled around Eton, had dinner in a 300 year old pub we'd eaten in on our
1998 visit, all by ourselves in a dining room right out of a Renaissance play
(heavy dark wood, maroon colored drapes, dim lights), and a lovely maid hailing
from Poland who served us. A fine finale.
And then homeward bound. "Country roads, take me home,
to the place I belong..."
Friday, April 13, 2012
Springing Out
I'm about to finish my book. My readers advise me to truncate the title, and I wonder if the one word
that seems to fit will be snappy enough. How does Duplicities sound?
that seems to fit will be snappy enough. How does Duplicities sound?
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Happily Divorced: new sitcom
I am a big fan of semiotics: examining the signs of the culture and their underlying values systems. As a result of teaching college critical thinking with a semiotic focus for fiften years, I'm especially drawn to the kinds of images on television and in films which have strong effects on our beliefs. For example, it's fascinating to look at "Will and Grace" and "Everybody Loves Raymond" and examine why the main relationships in the both programs work. Is "Will and Grace," for example, not showing us the main characters as such good friends--all the while allowing us to believe that perhaps some day Will will "straighten out" and and marry Grace? And Ray's marriage: check how many times Ray's wife appears doing housework, making deals with her husband using sex as leverage and so forth. As I led my classes through this type of viewing/thinking exercise, we all became aware how we were being manipulated in very subtle ways to accept, for example, that the Romanos are showing us a model marriage.
While I am not a fan of sitcoms (who'd believe this now?), the press on "Happily Divorced" intrigued me, particularly in light of our country's current squabbling with all things gay and the fact that I also unknowingly married a homosexual in the 60s.
In the first episode, just after what the wife (Fran Drescher) calls great sex, the husband (Michael John Higgins) announces that he is gay. After a lot of fluttering and canned laughter, (no tears or recriminations on either side) they decide to divorce but live under the same roof for economic reasons. What ensues is the story of the transition, complete with visits from her parents and a new love interest for Fran. Jolly quips all round and more canned laughter.
I don't know yet what kind of ratings this sitcom has earned, but the fact of its existence tells me there are lots of folks out there whose curiosity can be peaked by the topic. So I have to add this presentation to all the other fantasies that television sitcoms feed us, because I doubt if anyone who goes through this situation finds it amusing. As it has always done by portraying gay men as effeminate and swish (to gales of laughter), this media presentation here seems to suggest that the "finding out" or "discovery" in "homosexual/heterosexual" marriages can be a fun-filled event.
I'm aware that this program is meant to be comedy. But I'm also aware of the way the media affects our personal values systems. In fact, "Happily Divorced" is a flat out lie. In reality, it's a painful situation, one that often leaves the straight spouse in the dark for years and when h/she is enlightened, confused and disturbed. As for the gay spouse, as "Brokeback Mountain" reveals, there is untold pain to homosexual love in a culture that labels those choices as evil or unnatural.
While I am not a fan of sitcoms (who'd believe this now?), the press on "Happily Divorced" intrigued me, particularly in light of our country's current squabbling with all things gay and the fact that I also unknowingly married a homosexual in the 60s.
In the first episode, just after what the wife (Fran Drescher) calls great sex, the husband (Michael John Higgins) announces that he is gay. After a lot of fluttering and canned laughter, (no tears or recriminations on either side) they decide to divorce but live under the same roof for economic reasons. What ensues is the story of the transition, complete with visits from her parents and a new love interest for Fran. Jolly quips all round and more canned laughter.
I don't know yet what kind of ratings this sitcom has earned, but the fact of its existence tells me there are lots of folks out there whose curiosity can be peaked by the topic. So I have to add this presentation to all the other fantasies that television sitcoms feed us, because I doubt if anyone who goes through this situation finds it amusing. As it has always done by portraying gay men as effeminate and swish (to gales of laughter), this media presentation here seems to suggest that the "finding out" or "discovery" in "homosexual/heterosexual" marriages can be a fun-filled event.
I'm aware that this program is meant to be comedy. But I'm also aware of the way the media affects our personal values systems. In fact, "Happily Divorced" is a flat out lie. In reality, it's a painful situation, one that often leaves the straight spouse in the dark for years and when h/she is enlightened, confused and disturbed. As for the gay spouse, as "Brokeback Mountain" reveals, there is untold pain to homosexual love in a culture that labels those choices as evil or unnatural.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)